MT Insurance Law Blog

Double exposure image with a businessman holding an umbrella laid over a cityscape background

Miller Thomson Blogs put a more conversational lens on Canadian law. See the diverse perspectives of our lawyers here.

Displaying 131-140 of 315

Ontario Court of Appeal addresses Accident Benefit deductions from Tort award

August 18, 2016 | James D. Bromiley

The Ontario Court of Appeal recently revisited the issue of the deductibility of no-fault accident benefits from an award for tort damages.  In Basandra v. Sforza, 2016 ONCA 251, the Plaintiff brought an action for damages arising from injuries he...

More

Insurance Policies – Better Catch ‘Em All!

August 15, 2016 | Emily C. Durst

Pokémon Go is the latest gaming phenomenon that is taking the world by storm. Within one week of its launch, 65 million people had downloaded the game to their device. Android and iPhone users all over the world are playing...

More

Automobiles Owned by the Insured or Spouse are “Uninsured Automobiles” when Taken without Consent

August 3, 2016 | Andrew Hentz

In the recent case Skunk v Ketash, 2016 ONSC 2019, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice examined the availability of uninsured and underinsured coverage to a policyholder’s spouse where the vehicle is operated without the consent of the owner. The...

More

Does the Failure to Equip a Vehicle with Winter Tires Equate to Negligence?

July 19, 2016 | Theodore J. Madison

Evidence now clearly shows that winter tires are superior to all other types of tires in winter driving conditions.[1] Winter tires maintain elasticity at low temperatures allowing for better vehicle control in both braking and turning ability.[2] Despite compelling scientific...

More

Adverse Cost Insurance: Evolving Case Law

July 15, 2016 | Evan Bawks

A growing issue in personal injury litigation has been the propagation of adverse cost insurance, also known as “after-the-event” insurance. This insurance is typically a policy purchased by a plaintiff in a lawsuit to provide protection in the event of...

More

A Defendant By Any Other Name: Of Limitation Periods, John Doe, and Misnomer

July 7, 2016 | Eric A.F. Grigg

Having read the reasons for decision in Stechyshyn v. Domljanovic, 2015 ONCA 889 you would be forgiven for wondering whether the panel of the Court of Appeal had taken in a showing of Romeo and Juliet during their deliberations. The...

More

Back to the Future (Contract): Job Offers and Economic Loss for Attendant Care Service Providers

June 23, 2016 | Helen D.K. Friedman

When the “future contract” provisions were eliminated from the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule effective April 15, 2004, the industry breathed a sigh of relief that yet another category of “questionable” claims for Income Replacement Benefits were being eliminated. Recall prior...

More

The Worth of “Diminished Value” Claims in Ontario

June 20, 2016 | Patricia J. Forte

Introduction The claim goes by many names: “diminished value”, “diminution in value” and “accelerated depreciation”. The terms are interchangeably used to describe the economic loss of a property’s value as a result of the property having been damaged.[1] The concept...

More

Transitional Issues for Mediating/Arbitrating AB Disputes

June 16, 2016 | Nawaz Tahir

With the change from FSCO to the LAT, some questions have arisen about when it is too late to file for a mediation at FSCO, what the effect of an outstanding mediation is on a LAT proceeding, how limitation period...

More

Limitation Period Trumps Invalid Election

May 31, 2016 | Evan Bawks

The recent FSCO decision on a preliminary issue in Kanagalingam v. Economical Mutual Insurance Company[1] confirms that insurers can rely on the statutory two-year limitation period when a weekly benefit is properly denied, even if the underlying election of benefits...

More

Displaying 131-140 of 315

Disclaimer

This blog sets out a variety of materials relating to the law to be used for educational and non-commercial purposes only; the author(s) of this blog do not intend the blog to be a source of legal advice. Please retain and seek the advice of a lawyer and use your own good judgement before choosing to act on any information included in the blog. If you choose to rely on the materials, you do so entirely at your own risk.

3.002