Miller Thomson Blogs put a more conversational lens on Canadian law. See the diverse perspectives of our lawyers here.
MT Insurance Law Blog
A Race to the Finish – Insurers Line Up for Uber’s Business
January 25, 2016
|
In the last quarter of 2015 two insurers, Aviva Canada[i] and Wawanesa Insurance[ii], were reported to be cancelling personal auto policies for drivers who were using their personal vehicles to pick up passengers for hire. In contrast, on September 8,...
More Limitation Period Success
January 21, 2016
|
The Court of Appeal has once again confirmed an insurers’ right to the predictability of the two year limitation period in Bonaccorso v. Optimum Insurance Company Inc., 2016 ONCA 34. The plaintiff appealed the decision of Justice H.S. Arrell which...
Regular Use of a Truck Includes Recreational Tailgate Diving
January 15, 2016
|
In Roberts v. Intact Insurance Company (FSCO A14-002957), Arbitrator Musson found that Intact was responsible for the payment of accident benefits to a young woman who had injured herself while diving into a shallow lake, with a considerable amount of...
Duty to Defend the “Additional Insured”
January 14, 2016
|
In a recent Court of Appeal Decision of Carneiro v. Regional Municipality of Durham et al v. Zurich Insurance Company Ltd. 2015 ON CA 909, the Court of Appeal appears to have laid to rest any doubt in terms of...
Unidentified Automobile Coverage and Relief from Forfeiture in the Face of Non-Compliance with Reporting Requirements
January 8, 2016
|
The Court of Appeal, in the case of Dams v. TD Home and Auto Insurance Company, 2016 ONCA 4 (CanLII), has reminded us of the law with respect to unidentified automobile insurance coverage in Ontario, particularly as it pertains to...
Section 5(1) of the Fault Determination Rules Interpreted
January 8, 2016
|
The Court of Appeal recently released a decision in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Aviva Canada Inc., 2015 ONCA 920 which interprets section 5(1) of the Fault Determination Rules. Rule 5(1) reads as follows: 5(1) If an incident...
Clarity on Quantum of the Statutory Deductible and Pre-Judgment Interest?
January 7, 2016
|
Vickers v. Palacious, 2015 ONSC 7647, December 8, 2015, James, J. In this case, the Justice James was asked to address threshold, pre-judgment interest and the quantum of the statutory deductible. The plaintiff was a cyclist that was struck in...
Square Pegs in Round Holes: Adjusting Claims Involving Rideshare Drivers
January 2, 2016
|
CampusLifts. Haxi. Kangaride. Lyft. Sidecar. Summon. UberX. Wingz. Sound familiar? They are colloquially known as “rideshare” services or transportation network companies (TNC). TNC’s typically do not provide transportation services themselves. Instead, they provide an online-enabled platform to connect passengers with...
The Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company v. Certas Direct Insurance Company – Clarification of “regular use” in priority disputes
December 10, 2015
Author: Gabriel Flatt A new decision was just released regarding the definition of “regular use” for the purpose of priority disputes. Argued ably by Miller Thomson’s very own Nicholaus de Koning on behalf of Dominion, this decision helps clarify and...
Does Uber insure all of us? Uber Users Buyer Beware
December 1, 2015
|
The “sharing economy” is on the rise and there is little chance of ebbing its tide. Popular sharing services such as airbnb, Lyft, Zipcar, Car2go and AutoShare have been in business for almost a decade but UberX appears to be...
Disclaimer
This blog sets out a variety of materials relating to the law to be used for educational and non-commercial purposes only; the author(s) of this blog do not intend the blog to be a source of legal advice. Please retain and seek the advice of a lawyer and use your own good judgement before choosing to act on any information included in the blog. If you choose to rely on the materials, you do so entirely at your own risk.
