Miller Thomson Blogs put a more conversational lens on Canadian law. See the diverse perspectives of our lawyers here.
MT Insurance Law Blog
No Love in an Elevator – Superior Court Denies Plaintiff’s Occupiers’ Liability Claim
November 22, 2013
|
Recently, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered an elevator maintenance contractor’s liability under the Occupiers’ Liability Act in Green v. York Region Condominium Corporation No. 834, a case in which the Plaintiff, Sallie Green, claimed damages for injuries she...
Insurers Must Prioritise Priority
November 11, 2013
A new Superior Court case looks at the interesting interplay between accident benefits priority disputes, estoppel, and extra-provincial accidents. A pedestrian was struck by a truck on a highway in Alberta on September 21, 2007. He suffered catastrophic injuries as...
Owner Vicariously Liable for Drunk Driver’s Accident
November 8, 2013
|
Recently, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered the vicarious liability of an owner of a vehicle for the negligence of the driver of the vehicle in the unfortunate case of Watts v. Boyce, Dunham and Co-Operators. The lawsuit in...
Particulars of surveillance are discoverable, even if surveillance will not be relied upon at trial
October 24, 2013
|
The superior court has ruled that a party who obtains surveillance must disclose the particulars of the surveillance on examination for discovery, even if they do not intend to rely on the surveillance at trial. In the case of Arsenault-Armstrong...
No Laches in Loss Transfer
October 1, 2013
The Superior Court has released an important loss transfer decision, finding that the equitable “doctrine of laches” does not apply in loss transfer proceedings. In Intact v. Lombard, Intact became responsible for paying accident benefits to its insured as a...
Conjugal Relationship does not a Spouse Make
September 12, 2013
The Superior Court has given us some guidance on what it means to have lived in a conjugal relationship for the three-year period before a motor vehicle accident. In ING v. Co-operators, the arbitrator found that Amy and Jason, who...
Oh Henry!: ONCA Upholds Economic Loss Decision
July 16, 2013
The Court of Appeal has released its decision in Henry v. Gore, unanimously upholding the motion judge’s decision on the meaning of the “economic loss” threshold under the new SABS-2010. Henry was catastrophically injured in a motor vehicle accident on...
Confirmation that Leave Required For Refusals Motion Following Delivery of Trial Record
July 15, 2013
|
Confirmation that Leave Required For Refusals Motion Following Delivery of Trial RecordHamilton v. Ontario (MTO) 2013 ONSC 4536 On July 15, 2013 Justice Firestone ruled that, where a party has delivered a trial record, they must obtain leave to bring...
Court: Plaintiff can Corroborate Doctor’s Evidence for Threshold Motion
July 5, 2013
|
In an interesting case heard on March 20, 2013, Ontario’s Divisional Court was faced with the question of whether or not a plaintiff is precluded from corroborating a physician’s evidence in relation to change of function, in the context of...
FSCO Un-Dewing What FSCO has Done
May 24, 2013
Insurers involved in FSCO proceedings should be aware that despite binding authorities instructing otherwise, FSCO Arbitrator Wilson has once again ordered an insurer to disclose “forthwith” whether or not it has any surveillance in its possession. And if it does...
Disclaimer
This blog sets out a variety of materials relating to the law to be used for educational and non-commercial purposes only; the author(s) of this blog do not intend the blog to be a source of legal advice. Please retain and seek the advice of a lawyer and use your own good judgement before choosing to act on any information included in the blog. If you choose to rely on the materials, you do so entirely at your own risk.
