Insurance & Risk Management

Displaying 351-360 of 388

ONCA Case Means Plaintiffs Must Prove Policy Breach

The Ontario Court of Appeal has allowed an appeal of an Order dismissing the plaintiffs’ action against their excess carrier, made under the Family Protection Endorsement (OPCF 44R) on their auto policy. The OPCF 44R endorsement is intended to protect...

More

FSCO Arbitrator Calls Slip & Fall a Motor Vehicle Accident

FSCO Arbitrator Joyce Miller has ruled that a claimant who slipped on ice after exiting her car, and after walking around the front of the car toward the curb, was involved in a motor vehicle accident for the purpose of...

More

SCC Deals with Falling Trees; Falling Leaves

The Supreme Court of Canada released two leave to appeal judgments today of interest. One application for leave was granted. The other was dismissed: In Allstate v. Primmum, a resident of Ontario was injured when he was struck by a...

More

All Four Areas of Function Must Be Assessed Under Section 2(1.1)(g) – CAT Impairments

The Divisional Court has just released its decision in Pastore and Aviva Canada Inc. Anna Pastore was involved in a car accident on November 16, 2002.  She suffered a fractured left ankle.  She had numerous surgeries and ultimately applied for...

More

Invasion of Privacy Tort could Cause Insurers New Headaches

Ontario’s Court of Appeal will rule on whether there is a common law tort for invasion of privacy in the province. The case under appeal is called Jones v. Tsige (March 23, 2011). Sandra Jones and the Winnie Tsige worked...

More

Sony Data Breach Raises Insurance Issues

On April 19, 2011, Sony suffered a massive breach in its video game online network that led to the theft of names, addresses and possibly credit card data belonging to 77 million user accounts. The company could not rule out...

More

Girlfriend’s evidence can be “corroborative” under OPCF 44R

The Ontario Court of Appeal released a decision today discussing the meaning of “other material evidence” and “independent witness evidence” under the OPCF 44R (Family Protection Endorsement). In Pepe v. State Farm, Massimo Pepe was injured in a single-car accident.  Shirley Aguirre,...

More

Limitations Act Does Not Apply to Priority Disputes

Markel and Co-operators (March 31, 2011 – Samis) Markel had not commenced arbitration within one year.  It argued that the Limitations Act applies and not Ontario Regulation 283/95. Section 7 of Ontario Regulation 283/95 requires the insurer to initiate arbitration...

More

Public Transit Motor Vehicle Accidents about to Become Non-Accidents

UPDATE — Bill 173 received Royal Assent on May 12, 2011. Accordingly, these important changes to the Insurance Act are now in effect. On March 29, 2011, the Ontario Legislature unveiled its pre-election budget, in Bill 173, otherwise known as the...

More

Equine Insurance – Are You Covered?

Equine Consumers' Guide

More

Displaying 351-360 of 388

MT Insurance Law Blog

View our latest blog posts.

View

Stay Informed

Sign-up to receive electronic communications, including newsletters on legal developments, event invitations, firm news and more.

Subscribe

1.779