Reframing the Refusal Motion: An Interesting Approach
A common occurrence in a litigation file is the refusal of a question posed during an examination for discovery. In some cases, the evidence underlying the question refused could be pivotal to the outcome of the litigation. In other cases,...
Reframing the Refusal Motion: An Interesting Approach
A common occurrence in a litigation file is the refusal of a question posed during an examination for discovery. In some cases, the evidence underlying the question refused could be pivotal to the outcome of the litigation. In other cases,...
Welcome!
Welcome to the Miller Thomson Litigation Blog! We are excited to unveil this new project where we will endeavour to keep our readership informed on interesting and noteworthy developments in the world of Canadian litigation. Our Miller Thomson litigation team...
Summary Judgment and Small Claims Court
The stated purpose of the Small Claims Court is to provide a streamlined process for parties to pursue claims of up to $25,000 in a cost-effective and efficient manner. In Superior Court, one of the options available to try and...
Experimental Testing in Litigation
The Federal Court has recently issued a practice direction relating to experimental testing for litigation. This practice direction resulted from arguments made in several recent cases to exclude testimony relating to experimental testing where the opposite party was not provided...
Against limited liability
The Lawyers Weekly
Affidavit Evidence in British Columbia
42 Advocates' Quarterly, 281
Asset Recovery: Canada
Getting the Deal Through - Asset Recovery in 18 Jurisdictions Worldwide
The limits of entrepreneurial liability
The Lawyers Weekly
Winning for the Carrier: Avoiding the Palm Tree (Again)
The Canadian Transport Lawyers' Association Annual Convention
