Insurance Defence

Displaying 231-240 of 329

FSCO Un-Dewing What FSCO has Done

Insurers involved in FSCO proceedings should be aware that despite binding authorities instructing otherwise, FSCO Arbitrator Wilson has once again ordered an insurer to disclose “forthwith” whether or not it has any surveillance in its possession. And if it does...

More

Court of Appeal Skunks Late Property Loss Claims

The Court of Appeal has allowed an insurer’s appeal asserting the one-year limitation period in an all-risk property policy. The decision highlights how important it is for insurance contracts – and especially limitation period provisions in them – to have...

More

Road Work Ahead: the Budget’s affect on the SABS

Spring has sprung in Ontario and with it yesterday we received the first budget of our new Premier Kathleen Wynne.  As the leader of a minority government, Premier Wynne faced pressures from the NDP to include certain things in the...

More

Will the Real Lessee Please Stand Up?

The Superior Court has released a decision dealing with the priority pecking order under section 277 of the Insurance Act. That section determines the order in which third party liability insurers have to respond to tort claims arising from a...

More

What is a “Self-propelled Implement of Husbandry”?

There is a new Superior Court decision answering the question of whether a particular uninsured all-terrain vehicle was required to be insured at the time of a motor vehicle accident. Although much of the decision is based on the facts...

More

Arbitrator Romances the Minor Injury Guideline with the Language of Love: MIG Seduced, Insurers Jilted

Author: Caroline Meyer The first Minor Injury Guideline (Guideline) decision has arrived. Pull out your French-English dictionary, as Arbitrator Wilson applies the language of love to determining Scarlett v. Belair, FSCO A12-00107, dated March 26, 2013. In this case, the...

More

Man sues insurer over stolen weed

A Superior Court judge has ruled that marijuana plants are, indeed, plants. In Stewart v. TD Insurance, the plaintiffs insured the contents of their residence under a policy with the defendant insurer. Stewart was licensed to possess and cultivate marijuana...

More

Living in the same residence is not necessary to be “residing with”

In a recent preliminary issue hearing for Rampersaud and TD General Insurance Company (FSCO A11-002773, February 19, 2013), FSCO’s Arbitrator John Wilson was asked to determine whether an adult daughter was entitled to receive caregiver benefits for care provided to...

More

Defining “occupier” – liability and control over land

Pursuant to section 3 of Ontario’s Occupier’s Liability Act, liability may arise from a failure of an occupier “to take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that persons entering on the premises, and the property...

More

To Defend, or Not to Defend, That is the Question ….

Vishal Malaviya (“VN”) was covered under Ontario’s Statutory AutomobilePolicy (the “SAP”) for motor vehicle insurance through Jevco Insurance Company (“Jevco”), having opted for the minimum liability limit of $200,000, and having been sued for an amount in excess of same...

More

Displaying 231-240 of 329

MT Insurance Law Blog

View our latest blog posts.

View

Stay Informed

Sign-up to receive electronic communications, including newsletters on legal developments, event invitations, firm news and more.

Subscribe

1.897