Les blogues de Miller Thomson abordent des points de droit canadien sous un angle plus informel. Découvrez les diverses perspectives de nos avocats.
Blogue : Droit des assurances
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
What does « Authorized by Law » to Drive Mean?
23 mai 2012
The Court of Appeal for Ontario has released a decision interpreting the meaning of the phrase “authorized by law” in s. 4(1) of O. Reg. 777/93 (Statutory Condition 4 in the OAP). In Kereluik v. Jevco, the insured Kereluik was...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
ONCA Affirms Start Date of OPCF 44R Limitation Period
14 mai 2012
The Court of Appeal for Ontario has affirmed that the limitation period in section 17 of the OPCF 44R (Family Protection Endorsement) starts from when the plaintiff has a body of evidence accumulated that would give him a “reasonable chance”...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Court Denies Plaintiff “Peace of Mind” SABS Declaration
9 mai 2012
A Superior Court judge has denied an accident benefits plaintiff a “peace of mind” declaration she sought with respect to her claim for income replacement benefits. The decision is interesting as it appears that the plaintiff might have been categorized...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Parveen and AVIVA: Practical steps for settlement of AB Claims
8 mai 2012
|
Since the Parveen and AVIVA decision (and its companion Fredric and AVIVA) was published on March 30, 2012 there has been considerable confusion regarding the adequacy of the Settlement Disclosure Notice (“SDN”). Prior to that time, the SDN has been understood to have...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Case Regarding Liability of Road Authority
4 mai 2012
|
On May 3, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed an application for leave to appeal the dismissal of an action seeking damages for alleged negligent road maintenance [Morsi v. Fermar Paving Limited et al, SCC 34515]. The claim arose...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Insurer Must Pay Stripper Pole Benefits
1 mai 2012
Yesterday the Ontario Divisional Court unanimously upheld FSCO’s decisions in Whipple v. Economical (affectionately known as the “stripper pole” case). In Whipple, the claimant and his golf buddies were returning via Interstate 90 from a day of golfing in New...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Ontario Court of Appeal Rules Husband Found Not Criminally Responsible for Wife’s Death Entitled to Life Insurance Proceeds
25 avril 2012
|
A husband and wife separated in 1992. In 1998 the husband took out a life insurance policy on his wife. In 2006 he killed his wife. He was charged with second degree murder. At trial was found not criminally responsible....
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
FSCO’s Settlement Disclosure Notice Overruled by FSCO
23 avril 2012
|
FSCO Arbitrator Suesan Alves has ruled that the (FSCO) prescribed Settlement Disclosure Notice might be inadequate to effect settlement. In Parveen v. Aviva, a preliminary issue was whether Ms. Parveen had rescinded her accident benefits settlement and was entitled to move to arbitration....
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
ONCA Sets Limitation Period for Loss Transfer Claims
6 avril 2012
The Court of Appeal for Ontario has clarified the limitation period law for loss transfer arbitrations. The issue before the Court was whether the limitation period to initiate arbitration starts the day after the first party insurer sends a loss...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
FSCO Fails to Force Facilities to Face Forbearance for Fraud
29 mars 2012
A FSCO arbitrator has denied an insurer’s request to stay 15 arbitration proceedings while it pursues fraud claims against notorious clinics at the Superior Court. There are 15 unrelated arbitration matters with a common denominator: the involvement of Assessment Direct...
Avis de non-responsabilité
This blog sets out a variety of materials relating to the law to be used for educational and non-commercial purposes only; the author(s) of this blog do not intend the blog to be a source of legal advice. Please retain and seek the advice of a lawyer and use your own good judgement before choosing to act on any information included in the blog. If you choose to rely on the materials, you do so entirely at your own risk.
