Les blogues de Miller Thomson abordent des points de droit canadien sous un angle plus informel. Découvrez les diverses perspectives de nos avocats.
Blogues de Miller Thomson
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Days may be numbered for the Material Contribution Causation Test
Blogue : Droit des assurances
Arbitrator John Wilson has released a decision casting doubt on the appropriateness of the prevalent use of the material contribution test for causation in accident benefit matters. In Kofi Agyapong v. Jevco Insurance Company, FSCO A11-003445, among numerous other issues,...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
The AB Alphabet Soup’s New Letters – SLASTO and LAT
Blogue : Droit des assurances
The Ontario Government, in their quest to reduce automobile insurance premiums, announced substantive and procedural changes to the accident benefits world that will be taking effect soon. This article deals with the procedural aspects of the changes. These changes are...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Hurley v OSPCA, 2015 ONSC 7784: OSPCA’s Power to Remove Animals
Le réseau alimentaire : les agroentreprises canadiennes et le droit en matière d'alimentation
In Hurley v. OSPCA, 2015 ONSC 7784 (CanLII), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice upheld an Ontario Animal Care Review Board decision in support of the removal of 25 horses and one goat from a northern Ontario farm by the...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Refresh/Reset – Multiple $2,000.00 Deductibles Allowed in Loss Transfer Claims
Blogue : Droit des assurances
A recent Superior Court decision (Economical v. Northbridge, 2016 ONSC 458) has provided the industry with a refresh/reset in applying the $2,000.00 statutory deductible in loss transfer claims. The deductible in issue is set out in section 275(3) of the...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
A Race to the Finish – Insurers Line Up for Uber’s Business
Blogue : Droit des assurances
In the last quarter of 2015 two insurers, Aviva Canada[i] and Wawanesa Insurance[ii], were reported to be cancelling personal auto policies for drivers who were using their personal vehicles to pick up passengers for hire. In contrast, on September 8,...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
More Limitation Period Success
Blogue : Droit des assurances
The Court of Appeal has once again confirmed an insurers’ right to the predictability of the two year limitation period in Bonaccorso v. Optimum Insurance Company Inc., 2016 ONCA 34. The plaintiff appealed the decision of Justice H.S. Arrell which...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Changes in the Criminal Code: Employee Rights in a Time of Legal Chaos
Blogue du secteur du droit du travail et de l'emploi au Canada
Introduction In 2016, employees may be faced with requests from employers or from others whom the employees serve to participate in activities that are prohibited by the Criminal Code. There are two areas, in particular, of potential legal conflict in...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Regular Use of a Truck Includes Recreational Tailgate Diving
Blogue : Droit des assurances
In Roberts v. Intact Insurance Company (FSCO A14-002957), Arbitrator Musson found that Intact was responsible for the payment of accident benefits to a young woman who had injured herself while diving into a shallow lake, with a considerable amount of...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Duty to Defend the « Additional Insured »
Blogue : Droit des assurances
In a recent Court of Appeal Decision of Carneiro v. Regional Municipality of Durham et al v. Zurich Insurance Company Ltd. 2015 ON CA 909, the Court of Appeal appears to have laid to rest any doubt in terms of...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Disciplinary action against an employee after a comment on Facebook. Where is the limit ?
Blogue du secteur du droit du travail et de l'emploi au Canada
Author: Raphaël Viens Côté In a recent arbitration decision, Centre de la petite enfance Allô mon ami c. Le Syndicat de la Nouvelle Union (CSQ), 2015 QCTA 749, the question was once again tackled. The employer is a kindergarten operator...
Avis de non-responsabilité
This blog sets out a variety of materials relating to the law to be used for educational and non-commercial purposes only; the author(s) of this blog do not intend the blog to be a source of legal advice. Please retain and seek the advice of a lawyer and use your own good judgement before choosing to act on any information included in the blog. If you choose to rely on the materials, you do so entirely at your own risk.