Les blogues de Miller Thomson abordent des points de droit canadien sous un angle plus informel. Découvrez les diverses perspectives de nos avocats.
Blogues de Miller Thomson
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
An Overview of Transfer Pricing In Canada
25 avril 2014
Blogue : Exploiter une entreprise au Canada pour les non-résidents
This posting was authored by Stephen Rukavina, an Associate in the Vancouver Office of Miller Thomson LLP Introduction In Canada v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc. (“GlaxoSmithKline”), Justice Rothstein of the Supreme Court of Canada succinctly summarized transfer pricing and the tax concerns...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Updating Plant Breeders’ Rights, Part II – Rights Granted by the Current Act
24 avril 2014
|
Le réseau alimentaire : les agroentreprises canadiennes et le droit en matière d'alimentation
In our blog entry posted on March 3, 2014, we set out the broad context for the amendments to the Plant Breeders’ Rights Act (“PBRA”). In this post we will discuss the current legislation and what breeders in Canada can...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Insurer can’t sue « Your and You »
23 avril 2014
Blogue : Droit des assurances
The Ontario Superior Court has released a subrogation decision dealing with two interesting issues: Assessing a defendant’s negligence and the ability of an insurer to subrogate against its own unnamed insured. In Rochon v. Rochon, the defendant was the plaintiffs’...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
New Canada Labour Code Changes
22 avril 2014
Blogue du secteur du droit du travail et de l'emploi au Canada
Author: Kara Bashutski On April 1, 2014, Bill C-45, also known as the Jobs and Growth Act, 2012, came into effect, amending parts of the Canada Labour Code (the “Code”). The Code applies to all federally regulated employers, such as...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Court of the Future
18 avril 2014
|
Blogue de l'équipe de litige
The Honourable Mr. Justice Brown is known for both his thorough and considered judgments as well as his occasional venting about inefficiencies in our court system. For instance, his 2012 endorsement in Romspen Investment Corp. v. 6176666 Canada Ltee begins with the...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
The Day The Dispute was Discovered…
14 avril 2014
|
Blogue : Droit des assurances
Recently, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered the “discoverability principle” in the context of a dispute between insurers over which should pay damages arising out of a car accident in Economical Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance. In March of...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Summary Judgment in Contaminated Land Litigation
10 avril 2014
|
Blogue de l'équipe de litige
Summary Judgment – a potential tool in defending contaminated land litigation In Windsor v. Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd., 2014 ABCA 108 (“Windsor”), the Alberta Court of Appeal summarily dismissed certain claims in an environmental class action. The appellant, Canadian Pacific...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Reframing the Refusal Motion: An Interesting Approach
9 avril 2014
|
Blogue de l'équipe de litige
A common occurrence in a litigation file is the refusal of a question posed during an examination for discovery. In some cases, the evidence underlying the question refused could be pivotal to the outcome of the litigation. In other cases,...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Co-operative Federalism Reinforced: Workers’ Compensation Rules Clarified
8 avril 2014
|
Blogue du secteur du droit du travail et de l'emploi au Canada
Parliament said that it desired a flexible approach to workers’ compensation for federal employees across Canada when it passed the Government Employees Compensation Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. G-5 (“GECA”). The Supreme Court of Canada upheld that model of flexibility for...
( Disponible en anglais seulement )
Court Has Inherent Jurisdiction to Order “Non-Medical” Assessment but Defendants Must Show Assessment is Necessary for Trial Fairness Ziebenhous v. Bahlieda 2014 ONSC 138
7 avril 2014
|
Blogue : Droit des assurances
In a decision released on April 2, 2014, the Divisional Court affirmed the Court has inherent authority to order a plaintiff to attend a “non-medical” assessment. The case dealt with two different actions where defendants had sought to have assessments...
Avis de non-responsabilité
This blog sets out a variety of materials relating to the law to be used for educational and non-commercial purposes only; the author(s) of this blog do not intend the blog to be a source of legal advice. Please retain and seek the advice of a lawyer and use your own good judgement before choosing to act on any information included in the blog. If you choose to rely on the materials, you do so entirely at your own risk.